Closed treebeard closed 7 years ago
infowars.com
Sorry, I'm not going to add this one. The fact is, I agree that it's terrible, and that its journalistic integrity is really on the low end of the scale, but it doesn't match the definition of fake news I put forward in the manifesto.
BTW, before merging list edits I'd prefer to solve #10, so that I don't ask anyone to do their work twice.
christwire.org dcgazette.com dailycurrant.com naturalnews.com infowars.com worldtruth.tv