Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
[deleted comment]
Idiot...
Original comment by steven.n...@gmail.com
on 31 Jan 2013 at 2:06
Should we also remove the nodeps configuration as per
https://github.com/KentBeck/junit/blob/master/doc/ReleaseNotes4.11.md#maven-arti
facts ?
"Maven artifacts
Up until now there were two Maven artifacts for JUnit: junit:junit-dep and
junit:junit. From a Maven point-of-view only the former made sense because it
did not contain the Hamcrest classes but declared a dependency to the Hamcrest
Maven artifact. The latter included the Hamcrest classes which was very
un-Maven-like.
From this release on, you should use junit:junit which will be what
junit:junit-dep used to. If you still reference junit:junit-dep, Maven will
automatically relocate you to the new junit:junit and issue a warning for you
to fix."
Original comment by grumpyja...@gmail.com
on 31 Jan 2013 at 4:17
Yes, I think we should.
Original comment by steven.n...@gmail.com
on 31 Jan 2013 at 4:34
Done.
Original comment by steven.n...@gmail.com
on 31 Jan 2013 at 4:46
Attachments:
Thanks, added in r394.
FYI, removed "default" configuration, as this is the "default" when none are
given.
Original comment by archie.c...@gmail.com
on 4 Feb 2013 at 2:38
Oops, meant "added in r2569".
Original comment by archie.c...@gmail.com
on 4 Feb 2013 at 2:38
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
steven.n...@gmail.com
on 31 Jan 2013 at 2:04