[feat] Deduplicate spans based upon their hashcode

[cdanis]

Which problem is this PR solving?

• Resolves #6001

Description of the changes

• Rename the Zipkin-legacy span "deduper" to a less confusing name
• Add a real span deduper that deduplicates based on span hashcodes
• Sort tags in spans before we attempt deduplication, so hashcode is deterministic

How was this change tested?

• Unit tested

Checklist

• [x] I have read https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
• [x] I have signed all commits
• [x] I have added unit tests for the new functionality
• [x] I have run lint and test steps successfully
  • for jaeger: make lint test
  • for jaeger-ui: yarn lint and yarn test

[cdanis]

@yurishkuro as discussed! let me know if you want anything else changed

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 96.79%. Comparing base (d243452) to head (3dcc05c). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #6009 +/- ## =========================================== + Coverage 51.48% 96.79% +45.31% =========================================== Files 176 349 +173 Lines 8875 16582 +7707 =========================================== + Hits 4569 16050 +11481 + Misses 3863 343 -3520 + Partials 443 189 -254 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/jaegertracing/jaeger/pull/6009/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jaegertracing) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [badger_v1](https://app.codecov.io/gh/jaegertracing/jaeger/pull/6009/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jaegertracing) | `8.00% <0.00%> (-0.02%)` | :arrow_down: | | [badger_v2](https://app.codecov.io/gh/jaegertracing/jaeger/pull/6009/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jaegertracing) | `1.82% <0.00%> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | | [cassandra-4.x-v1](https://app.codecov.io/gh/jaegertracing/jaeger/pull/6009/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jaegertracing) | `16.56% <0.00%> (-0.04%)` | :arrow_down: | | [cassandra-4.x-v2](https://app.codecov.io/gh/jaegertracing/jaeger/pull/6009/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jaegertracing) | `1.75% <0.00%> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | | [cassandra-5.x-v1](https://app.codecov.io/gh/jaegertracing/jaeger/pull/6009/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jaegertracing) | `16.56% <0.00%> (-0.04%)` | :arrow_down: | | [cassandra-5.x-v2](https://app.codecov.io/gh/jaegertracing/jaeger/pull/6009/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jaegertracing) | `1.75% <0.00%> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | | [elasticsearch-6.x-v1](https://app.codecov.io/gh/jaegertracing/jaeger/pull/6009/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jaegertracing) | `18.72% <0.00%> (-0.06%)` | :arrow_down: | | [elasticsearch-7.x-v1](https://app.codecov.io/gh/jaegertracing/jaeger/pull/6009/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jaegertracing) | `18.79% <0.00%> (-0.05%)` | :arrow_down: | | [elasticsearch-8.x-v1](https://app.codecov.io/gh/jaegertracing/jaeger/pull/6009/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jaegertracing) | `18.98% <0.00%> (-0.04%)` | :arrow_down: | | [elasticsearch-8.x-v2](https://app.codecov.io/gh/jaegertracing/jaeger/pull/6009/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jaegertracing) | `1.82% <0.00%> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | | [grpc_v1](https://app.codecov.io/gh/jaegertracing/jaeger/pull/6009/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jaegertracing) | `9.52% <7.40%> (-0.04%)` | :arrow_down: | | [grpc_v2](https://app.codecov.io/gh/jaegertracing/jaeger/pull/6009/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jaegertracing) | `7.13% <7.40%> (-0.02%)` | :arrow_down: | | [kafka-v1](https://app.codecov.io/gh/jaegertracing/jaeger/pull/6009/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jaegertracing) | `9.71% <7.40%> (-0.03%)` | :arrow_down: | | [kafka-v2](https://app.codecov.io/gh/jaegertracing/jaeger/pull/6009/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jaegertracing) | `1.82% <0.00%> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | | [memory_v2](https://app.codecov.io/gh/jaegertracing/jaeger/pull/6009/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jaegertracing) | `1.82% <0.00%> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | | [opensearch-1.x-v1](https://app.codecov.io/gh/jaegertracing/jaeger/pull/6009/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jaegertracing) | `18.83% <0.00%> (-0.05%)` | :arrow_down: | | [opensearch-2.x-v1](https://app.codecov.io/gh/jaegertracing/jaeger/pull/6009/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jaegertracing) | `18.84% <0.00%> (-0.05%)` | :arrow_down: | | [opensearch-2.x-v2](https://app.codecov.io/gh/jaegertracing/jaeger/pull/6009/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jaegertracing) | `1.81% <0.00%> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | | [tailsampling-processor](https://app.codecov.io/gh/jaegertracing/jaeger/pull/6009/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jaegertracing) | `0.46% <0.00%> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/jaegertracing/jaeger/pull/6009/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jaegertracing) | `95.27% <100.00%> (?)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=jaegertracing#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[cdanis]

PTAL :D

[cdanis]

added additional tests because patch code coverage failed