Closed jafeha closed 11 years ago
why in the world do we need files bigger than 4GB?
afair are ntfs sticks not supported under osx
I thought there was support in osx for NTFS today, but i have no mac for testing. The thing is: the fs type is limiting the maximum container size to 4gb if we keep fat support. I don't care about the FS type within the container, but for the stick this is imho a massive limitation. But this discussion only makes sense if osx really has full NTFS support.
it's not supported out of the box, only via fuse.http://sourceforge.net/projects/ntfs-3g/ this is only the source code!
imo we should use FAT. if the binarys are a 1gbyte there will be 3gig left for emails & attachments.
when we support encrypting whole sticks, total file size size bigger than 4gig will be supportet.
ACK. wontfix for a while.
we should consider to support ntfs sticks only. it's the only fs that is fully supported by all three operating systems we want to implement and it is capable of files > 4GB.
Imho would forcing ntfs be much better than dealing with FAT's filesize problems. I'd also suggest to format stick and container with ntfs.