Open meecect opened 4 years ago
@meecect you don't have to do that. Astronomy is already creating index for the type
field for you https://github.com/jagi/meteor-astronomy/blob/v2/lib/modules/storage/hooks/apply_definition.js#L100
thank you, I was kinda assuming that it would, but thought I'd ask anyway.
I have something like:
and then numerous subclasses of that.
I was thinking of adding an index on type so I did like this:
Does that sound reasonable? Is there any issue defining the field (and the index) like that even though I already specified the 'typeField' parameter?
Thanks