--------------Original Comment History----------------------------
Comment from = rmannibucau on 2015-09-05 09:23:40 +0000
Let take the case of a reader->processor->writer. I wonder if we couldnt add globally in the job some converters - a bit like JPA/JSF/... - to be able to respect the flow even if one "->" doesnt match.
if reader returns a Foo and processor processes a Bar and we have a converter Foo-> Bar then the flow can be respected even if reader->processor types don't match.
Side note: this implies to be able to type components and not rely on "Object" which is good as well IMO.
Originally opened as bug 7289 by rmannibucau
--------------Original Comment History---------------------------- Comment from = rmannibucau on 2015-09-05 09:23:40 +0000
Let take the case of a reader->processor->writer. I wonder if we couldnt add globally in the job some converters - a bit like JPA/JSF/... - to be able to respect the flow even if one "->" doesnt match.
if reader returns a Foo and processor processes a Bar and we have a converter Foo-> Bar then the flow can be respected even if reader->processor types don't match.
Side note: this implies to be able to type components and not rely on "Object" which is good as well IMO.