Closed JohnTimm closed 4 years ago
@alexsm82 this hasn't moved at all and now it appears to have conflicts with master. where do we go from here?
@m0mus any feedback on this approach?
Sorry for delay. It looks fine to me, but I want @lukasj to review it. Also, please add tests.
Closing this PR in favor of #218.
On a bird's eye view it is not so different from how JSR 385 and others cache providers. I'd like someone from Oracle to check it out if possible.