Closed hussainnm closed 2 years ago
This looks sensible. I would mark this as "good first issue" and "help wanted". We should be able to recruit end users to do this after that.
Reza Rahman Jakarta EE Ambassador, Author, Blogger, Speaker
Please note views expressed here are my own as an individual community member and do not reflect the views of my employer.
It's now also worth to add what was changed for 3.1 version. It's not too much, basically only support for repeatable annotations. Here's the list of all changes in 3.1: https://github.com/jakartaee/messaging/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed+milestone%3A3.1.0
Fixed for 3.0 by https://github.com/jakartaee/messaging/pull/314
The specification document currently has no mention of what has changed between Jakarta Messaging 2.0 and 3.0 release. A basic write-up of namespace change from javax to jakarta is required