After PR #298 for issue #151 we need to add a test to the TCK that uses the @JMSDestinationDefinition annotation repeatably and verifies the vendor supports it. For that we can most likely find the test that uses @JMSDestinationDefinitions and copy/modify it. Hopefully there is a test that uses that annotation meaningfully.
OndroMih
commented
2 years ago
After PR #298 for issue #151 we need to add a test to the TCK that uses the
@JMSDestinationDefinitionannotation repeatably and verifies the vendor supports it. For that we can most likely find the test that uses@JMSDestinationDefinitionsand copy/modify it. Hopefully there is a test that uses that annotation meaningfully.