Compatibility certification request for Eclipse OpenMQ 6.4.0 for Jakarta Messaging 3.1 (of Jakarta EE 10)

[pzygielo]

• [x] Organization Name ("Organization") and, if applicable, URL: Eclipse Foundation
• [x] Product Name, Version and download URL (if applicable): Eclipse OpenMQ 6.4.0
• [x] Specification Name, Version and download URL: Jakarta Messaging 3.1
• [x] TCK Version, digital SHA-256 fingerprint and download URL: Jakarta Messaging TCK 3.1.0, SHA-256: 3ea9e4d9eb6c7ebd2f60f920c1e76ea2e2928540b0eee78120a18453d5851644
• [x] Public URL of TCK Results Summary: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/openmq/releases/download/6.4.0-RELEASE/tck-summary.txt
• [x] Any Additional Specification Certification Requirements: None
• [x] Java runtime used to run the implementation: OpenJDK 11.0.2+9
• [x] Summary of the information for the certification environment, operating system, cloud, ...:
  • TCK executed using the OpenMQ Jenkins instance, the 2_openmq-run-tck-against-staged-build job
• [x] By checking this box I acknowledge that the Organization I represent accepts the terms of the EFTL.
• [x] By checking this box I attest that all TCK requirements have been met, including any compatibility rules.

[pzygielo]

On March 14 (14 days ago) I've emailed tck@eclipse.org with Compatibility certification request for Eclipse OpenMQ 6.4.0 for Jakarta Messaging 3.1. I've got reply: [...] you may consider that requirement complete (some conditions apply).

May I ask to have this issue checked if anything is missing or changes are required here and have this processed (labelled, approved/rejected), please?

@dblevins

---

https://jakarta.ee/committees/specification/tckprocess/

Certification Resolution

As noted, certification requests do not in themselves grant rights to use the Jakarta EE logo. Approval that the TCK requirements have been met is a prerequisite for obtaining Jakarta EE logo usage for profile certification. The required approval processes is:

• Approval by lazy consensus after a period of two weeks (14 days)

• Approval by a majority vote of the specification project as soon as it happens. The sum of the +1/-1 votes must be greater than 50% of the specification project committers.

• Approval by any top-level specification project lead at any time

[ivargrimstad]

LGTM +1

[pzygielo]

Thanks for checking!