Typo in the specification

lukasj commented 9 years ago

In section 4.12 of the specification (JSR 338 JPA 2.1 Final Release for Evaluation), "wrappered" should be "wrapped".

lukasj commented 6 years ago

Issue Imported From: https://github.com/javaee/jpa-spec/issues/101
Original Issue Raised By:@glassfishrobot
Original Issue Assigned To: @ldemichiel

lukasj commented 9 years ago

@glassfishrobot Commented Reported by anthony_ve

lukasj commented 7 years ago

@glassfishrobot Commented This issue was imported from java.net JIRA JPA_SPEC-101

m-reza-rahman commented 3 years ago

This looks like a good candidate for a community/end-user contribution. I would suggest marking it with "good first issue" and/or "help wanted". That will help facilitate recruiting people to contribute. I would honestly also mark this low priority.

Reza Rahman Jakarta EE Ambassador, Author, Blogger, Speaker

Please note views expressed here are my own as an individual community member and do not reflect the views of my employer.

tofflos commented 3 years ago

I found the typo in section 4.12 Equality and Comparison Semantics at https://download.oracle.com/otn-pub/jcp/persistence-2_1-fr-eval-spec/JavaPersistence.pdf but it's no longer present in the master branch.

$ grep -R "Equality and Comparison Semantics" -A 10 -h

=== Equality and Comparison Semantics [[a5735]]

Only the values of like types are permitted to be compared. A type is like another type if they correspond to the same Java language type, or if one is a primitive Java language type and the other is the wrapped Java class type equivalent (e.g., int and Integer are like types in this sense). There is one exception to this rule: it is valid to compare numeric values for which the rules of numeric promotion apply. Conditional expressions attempting to compare non-like type values are disallowed except for this numeric case.

lukasj commented 3 years ago

Let's close this then. Thanks for checking @tofflos !

jakartaee / persistence

Typo in the specification #101