Compatibility Certification Request for RESTEasy 6.1.0.Beta2

[jamezp]

• [x] Organization Name ("Organization") and, if applicable, URL Red Hat, Inc
• [x] Product Name, Version and download URL (if applicable) RESTEasy 6.1.0.Beta2, see TCK Result Summary for the download links
• [x] Specification Name, Version and download URL Jakarta RESTful Web Services 3.1
• [x] TCK Version, digital SHA-256 fingerprint and download URL Jakarta RESTful Web Services TCK 3.1.0, SHA-256: ea8cd6cc857af55f19468bbb09e8a30f41c60e8f7413a093e7007c3902a49070
• [x] Public URL of TCK Results Summary TCK results summary
• [x] Any Additional Specification Certification Requirements None
• [x] Java runtime used to run the implementation JDK 11.0.2+9
• [x] Summary of the information for the certification environment, operating system, cloud, ... Linux
• [x] By checking this box I acknowledge that the Organization I represent accepts the terms of the EFTL.
• [x] By checking this box I attest that all TCK requirements have been met, including any compatibility rules.

[mkarg]

I would like to repeat the test on my own machine. Is there a public document listing the needed commands, or is there a POM that I could simply execute?

[jamezp]

@mkarg Sure thing. This is the project we're using https://github.com/resteasy/resteasy-tck-runner. The README should be straight forward, but please feel free to ping me if you've got questions.

[mkarg]

I confirm that the product passes the TCK suite successfully:

Tests run: 2796, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 59

[jamezp]

Thank you @mkarg!

[jamezp]

Is there any update on this?

[mkarg]

Is there any update on this?

In what regard? What do you expect to happen?

[arjantijms]

I think that the request needs to be accepted and then closed. See e.g. https://github.com/jakartaee/faces/issues/1673

[arjantijms]

As committer I assert this is complete and therefor accepted.

[jamezp]

Thank you all. TBH I wasn't too sure what to expect with the exception of having RESTEasy listed as a compatible implementation :)

[jansupol]

I remember there was a need to send an email to tck@eclipse.org with "Approval to claim Jakarta RESTful Web Services 3.1 compatibility for <project name>" subject, so I was not sure who is about to react to this request...