Closed hussainnm closed 4 years ago
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
ok to test
retest this please
I have asked about the version numbers which should have appeared on https://www.eclipse.org/lists/jakartaee-spec-project-leads/2020/Sep/index.html but I don't see it yet. I copied jta-dev (https://www.eclipse.org/lists/jta-dev/msg00151.html)
I am holding on this a bit until we get some clarity on removing those version numbers. I think the reformatting of the document could be helpful because I saw some extraneous "_" in the current state and I think that this might correct that. Let's see if we get any negative feedback on removing the version numbers though (unless you would like to split that to a different PR and I can review this independent of that? Thanks!
Just to clarify, the version numbers that I have removed are only when referencing a component of a Jakarta technology and not the actual specification. If the specification is being referred to then version must be mentioned. All such references are maintained as-is.
Sorry I missed that! I will follow up on the thread I created as I don't think duplicating the version numbers inline in the text is particularly necessary.
I think the version numbering change looks good, I note that there remains a reference with version number to several of the specifications (not JTS or interceptors) which maybe could be made consistent (added to the missing JTS/Jakarta Interceptors or removed from Jakarta Enterprise Beans/JDBC/Jakarta Messaging/Jakarta Context Dependency Injection as appropriate.
It's now a case to find the time to try to review the PDF formatting.
@hussainnm is there some way to make it so the monospace is not red? Or did other specifications move to this way of presenting the information too?
Also please can you add something like the following into the change log too?
The red color comes from the theme file and it is the same in all specifications https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jta-api/blob/master/spec/src/main/theme/jakartaee-theme.yml#L81
Thanks for the contribution @hussainnm! I am going to merge this