Closed pzygielo closed 2 years ago
But this change is not needed for JDK 15+
ok to test
I need to find something that would cite that we explicitly support JDK 11 in EE10. Do you have a reference you can share? But I can also take a look for that reference myself too.
Thanks!
This change does not require JDK11, but enables its usage. And it works fine with JDK8.
Using newer JDK would still produce 1.8 classes: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jta-api/blob/7de86ad2c05276e034b0ede18ad8201586806f00/api/pom.xml#L37-L38
Sorry, I rather meant that there is some actual requirement to support JDK 11 in Jakarta EE 10. In theory otherwise we would not have a precedent to make a change.
IIUC then a build would fail with JDK 11 as it stands. I will configure CI to run with JDK 11 for the master
branch.
I have done that, so if I followed correctly so far then I think https://ci.eclipse.org/jta/job/eclipse-ee4j_jta-api-openjdk-jdk11-latest/1/ will fail to build javadoc due to a <br>
in api/src/main/java/jakarta/transaction/package.html until we can merge this PR
That looks to be the case. I do note some warnings too. I am going to try to set up PR testing for JDK 11 to verify the proposed change.
I might have been able to set this up I think (https://ci.eclipse.org/jta/job/eclipse-ee4j_jta-api-pulls-openjdk-11-latest/)
I think the output:
[WARNING] /home/jenkins/agent/workspace/eclipse-ee4j_jta-api-pulls-openjdk-11-latest/api/src/main/java/jakarta/transaction/package.html:34: warning: empty <p> tag
[WARNING] <p>
[WARNING] ^
[WARNING] /home/jenkins/agent/workspace/eclipse-ee4j_jta-api-pulls-openjdk-11-latest/api/src/main/java/jakarta/transaction/Transactional.java:68: warning: no @return
[WARNING] TxType value() default TxType.REQUIRED;
[WARNING] ^```
Should indicate the change for <br/> has allowed the build to proceed.
Thanks for checking and updating CI job. https://ci.eclipse.org/jta/job/eclipse-ee4j_jta-api-pulls-openjdk-11-latest/1/console:
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ cd /home/jenkins/agent/workspace/eclipse-ee4j_jta-api-pulls-openjdk-11-latest
+ mv glassfish/appserver/distributions/glassfish/target/glassfish.zip .
+ rm -rf glassfish
+ unzip -q glassfish.zip
+ ls glassfish6/glassfish/modules/
ls: cannot access 'glassfish6/glassfish/modules/': No such file or directory
It looks that current GF master which produces glassfish-7.0.0-SNAPSHOT-nightly.zip (https://download.eclipse.org/ee4j/glassfish/) has modules in glassfish7/glassfish/modules
directory now.
Thank you, for the heads up. I am not sure why but the javadocs were not archived but I made a change to the config there and to the glassfish as you mentioned.
I am going to retest this. Even if the glassfish part fails we could merge this but it would be good to get the PR job to have the javadocs for review.
retest this please
the build failed downloading the staged TCK (IIRC), I have updated the link
retest this please
Strange, build uses JDK 8 again:
[eclipse-ee4j_jta-api-pulls] $ /opt/tools/java/oracle/jdk-8/
Thank you for mentioning that - I have two jobs set up with the pull request configuration now so maybe it could be some quirk of that. I will try to trigger the JDK 11 one by hand and then maybe set up a matrix job instead with the two JDKs instead of the two separate ones.
In this case btw though I am not sure where you are getting the output you quoted from? Here is the most recent run and I think with JDK 11: https://ci.eclipse.org/jta/job/eclipse-ee4j_jta-api-pulls-openjdk-11-latest/9/consoleFull
retest this please
Most recent failure I hope I have corrected, there was a few paths hardcoded to /home/jenkins/agent/workspace/eclipse-ee4j_jta-api-pulls
and I think should/could be ${WORKSPACE}
In this case btw though I am not sure where you are getting the output you quoted from? Here is the most recent run and I think with JDK 11: https://ci.eclipse.org/jta/job/eclipse-ee4j_jta-api-pulls-openjdk-11-latest/9/consoleFull
Fron this run: https://ci.eclipse.org/jta/job/eclipse-ee4j_jta-api-pulls/278/ that was linked as "Details" in sumary for "default" job in this PR.
And now https://ci.eclipse.org/jta/job/eclipse-ee4j_jta-api-pulls/279/ is linked as failure.
I guess the default
gets replaced by the two completing jobs as they finish. I might be able to choose a different word for those which might help. BTW eclipse-ee4j_jta-api-pulls
is the JDK 8 version of the job (which I would keep) but I am going to change it's name to be clearer
BTW, I don't expect [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.8.1:compile (default-compile) on project tiger-types: Fatal error compiling: invalid target release: 11 -> [Help 1]
is caused by this PR - I need to look into that. I do think that "default" is getting replaced by the last job. If you would like to check on just the JDK 11 version of your job you could look into https://ci.eclipse.org/jta/job/eclipse-ee4j_jta-api-pulls-openjdk-11-latest/ for those starting PR #198
I expect.
Just a note - GF introduced profile fastest
, I think, with checkstyle, tests etc. disabled. So if this job just needs current glassfish only to proceed with TCK - perhaps its activation in mvn
call for GF could be considered?
BTW, I don't expect
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.8.1:compile (default-compile) on project tiger-types: Fatal error compiling: invalid target release: 11 -> [Help 1]
is caused by this PR - I need to look into that.
It's in GlassFish build, not jta-api. It's caused by the fact that javac from jdk8 does not support --release
flag that is set in GF.
I do think that "default" is getting replaced by the last job.
I also think that both of them report status for "default" label. Sadly, :red_square: https://ci.eclipse.org/jta/job/eclipse-ee4j_jta-api-pulls-openjdk-11-latest/10/
I will disable the testing of TCK on JDK8 for the master branch because the GlassFish EE 9.1+ implementation requires JDK11: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/glassfish/blob/master/README.md
Eclipse GlassFish 7.0.0 is Jakarta EE 10 compatible, requires Java 11, supports Java 18
Eclipse GlassFish 6.2.0 is Jakarta EE 9.1 compatible, requires Java 11, supports Java 17
Eclipse GlassFish 6.1.0 is Jakarta EE 9.1 compatible, requires Java 11
Eclipse GlassFish 6.0.0 is Jakarta EE 9 compatible, requires Java 8
I have also temporarily disabled https://ci.eclipse.org/jta/job/eclipse-ee4j_jta-api-pulls-oracle-jdk8-latest/ so that the jdk11 results will reflect in the PR
retest this please
I hope to have updated the job to get some more files, including the logs from glassfish
The logs are there now, something to do with missing RemoteStatus
(https://ci.eclipse.org/jta/job/eclipse-ee4j_jta-api-pulls-openjdk-11-latest/11/artifact/glassfish7/glassfish/domains/domain1/logs/server.log) - I wonder if the classpath is not quite right somewhere. I will look at the jte
Maybe something has changed in how the deployment works. I tried to diff a bit against a previous run on JDK8 that did work (https://ci.eclipse.org/jta/job/eclipse-ee4j_jta-api-pulls-oracle-jdk8-latest/267/consoleFull) with the JDK 11 run that failed (https://ci.eclipse.org/jta/job/eclipse-ee4j_jta-api-pulls-openjdk-11-latest/11/console) but it's not jumping out what the problem is
Can one of the admins verify this patch?