Closed defeo closed 6 years ago
I added a simplified estimate for \eta as a function of \epsilon for explicit parameters and implementation. But do I really need to reiterate the proofs of Theorems 7-8. It is basically a copy and past and I'm a bit reluctant to do that.
Well, you say in the paper that the proof must be modified to make it work for your case (switching the roles of the curve and the projective line). It's not the reader's job to play the modification for you.
You can leave out the proof of the lemmas, if there are any, pointing to Voloch's paper for it. But you should not abuse the reader's "diffing algorithm" by writing an incremental proof.
Anyway your paper is quite short, so I do not understand why you are reluctant (other than being lazy, which I can totally understand :)
Ok, details are added. I think it is rather self-contained now.
Much better!
Here:
https://github.com/javad-doliskani/divpoly_pit/blob/98734cc4aff5acd423f0d10277c6f9d0162e0eb5/divpoly_pit.tex#L624-L628
Without a precise definition for η, the reader can not:
Please give more details on the proofs of Theorems 7-8, and on the definition of η.