Open creisle opened 1 year ago
Case | Example Article | License | table index | Tests |
---|---|---|---|---|
header hierarchical colspans | PMC5029658 | CC-BY | 1,2,3 | ✅ |
body hierarchical rowspans | PMC5029658 | CC-BY | 0 | ✅ |
header hierarchical colspans | PMC2873663 | author version | redundant | |
body full colspans | PMC7461630 | author version | redundant | |
body full colspans | PMC4919728 | CC BY-NC-ND | 0 | ✅ |
body partial colspans | PMC4049792 | CC-BY NC | 0 | |
paragraphs inside table cells | PMC6580637 | CC-BY | 2 | ✅ |
empty cells that should be repeated | PMC4816447 | CC-BY | 0 |
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5029658/
Cell Line SUP-M2 IC50 | ||
---|---|---|
TKI | Crizotinib | 67.75 |
TKI | Ceritinib | 15.57 |
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7461630/
All patients in NTRK gene fusion-positive efficacy-evaluable population (n=54) | |
---|---|
Age, years | 58 (48-67) |
Sex: Female | 32 (59%) |
Sex: Male | 22 (41%) |
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4049792/table/T1/?report=objectonly
Total | Female | Male | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
n = | 1506 | 617 (41%) | 889 (59%) | |
Age | 61 ± 11.3 | 59 ± 12.1 | 61 ± 11.2 | 0.014 |
Tumor site (right vs left): Right | 365 (24.2%) | 177 (28.7%) | 188 (21.1%) | 0.001 |
Tumor site (right vs left): Left | 1141 (75.8%) | 440 (71.3%) | 701 (78.9%) | 0.001 |
Tumor site (right vs left vs rectum): Right | 365 (24.2%) | 177 (28.7%) | 188 (21.1%) | < 0.0001 |
Tumor site (right vs left vs rectum): Left | 538 (35.7%) | 228 (40.0%) | 310 (34.9%) | < 0.0001 |
Tumor site (right vs left vs rectum): Rectum | 603 (40.1%) | 212 (34.3%) | 391 (44.0%) | < 0.0001 |
@jakelever does this make sense to you? I am not sure about repeating the p-value since its for the 2-way and 3-way tests but there's not another way to make this one work
Here's one where the table XML is not formatted correctly so it didn't use a rowspan for the exon number despite it clearly being intended that way. Not sure there is a good way to fix this but i've put a test in that is skipped for now should we find a way to resolve this in the future
Another hard to interpret table example
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6030433/table/T1/?report=objectonly
These are tricky tables. Your proposed solution for Cases 1-3 look reasonable to me