Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Well, in svn branch development was done in branches.
I don't know if there is historical precede on mercurial, but we should of
course try to figure out what is most beneficial.
Original comment by lobais
on 17 Mar 2011 at 1:15
lobais, Mercurial branching vs. cloning:
* Named branches are for developing different branches or versions of the same
application,
* Clones are for managing different contributions to the same version of the
application.
Original comment by igo...@gmail.com
on 17 Mar 2011 at 1:38
We have several branches in hg. There are old ones, like f.e. database
transformed from svn, and a new one created by Justin.
Sometimes we have to merge in default branch when someone pushes a changeset
without updating hes local clone while another committer pushed another
changeset.
Original comment by gbtami
on 17 Mar 2011 at 5:20
Original comment by gbtami
on 17 Mar 2011 at 5:24
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
igo...@gmail.com
on 17 Mar 2011 at 1:09