codecov-io
commented
5 years ago Codecov Report
Merging #15 into master will increase coverage by
34.71%. The diff coverage is97.91%.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #15 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 60.12% 94.84% +34.71%
===========================================
Files 8 5 -3
Lines 632 407 -225
Branches 98 72 -26
===========================================
+ Hits 380 386 +6
+ Misses 222 12 -210
+ Partials 30 9 -21| Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| causalimpact/analysis.py | 94.82% <100%> (+58.97%) |
:arrow_up: |
| causalimpact/misc.py | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
| causalimpact/inferences.py | 96.29% <100%> (+9.25%) |
:arrow_up: |
| causalimpact/model.py | 88.23% <87.5%> (+38.23%) |
:arrow_up: |
| causalimpact/tests/test.py |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact),ø = not affected,? = missing dataPowered by Codecov. Last update 67aca3a...19c7975. Read the comment docs.
coveralls
jamalsenouci
Hello Jamal,
I'd like to propose this contribution to your repository. It's nothing new, the intent was to cover the whole code with unit tests.
I tried for the most part to just change the testing files and leave the main source as untouched as possible; when the tests showed something wrong then I made some modifications (there were a few bugs that have been eliminated in the testing process).
I plan on adding
p-valuecomputation next, please let me know what you think or if you want anything changed. If everything looks good them I'll start some new development :)!(sorry for having 2 users of mine, I switched machines between work and home and ended up leaving both in history.)
Regards,
Will