Closed mbeutel closed 5 years ago
Is there any reason why Boost's unordered_map<> implementation is used instead of the standard one which is available since C++11?
unordered_map<>
boost::unordered_map allows incomplete types, while the standard one doesn't guarantee that (depends on your vendor).
boost::unordered_map
Is there any reason why Boost's
unordered_map<>
implementation is used instead of the standard one which is available since C++11?