I don't know where it's appropriate to report this (I have tried email, but no response over a period of a few months), but the (online) asserted traits for the Order Topology are mostly incorrect. Of course these inaccuracies then spill over into the deduced traits.
Cardinality ≤2^(c): Depends on the particular space
Second Category: Depends on the particular space
Scattered: Depends on the particular space
¬Extremally Disconnected: Depends on the particular space
¬First Countable: Depends on the particular space
¬Locally Compact: Depends on the particular space
¬Pseudocompact: Depends on the particular space
¬Countable Chain Condition: Depends on the particular space
¬Countably Paracompact: False (all ordered spaces are countably paracompact)
Metacompact: Depends on the particular space
¬Normal: False (all ordered spaces are normal)
Zero Dimensional: Depends on the particular space
T_3(1/2): True
¬Weakly Countably Compact: Depends on the particular space
T_2(1/2): True
In general, there should be a better way to report inaccuracies in the data.
I don't know where it's appropriate to report this (I have tried email, but no response over a period of a few months), but the (online) asserted traits for the Order Topology are mostly incorrect. Of course these inaccuracies then spill over into the deduced traits.
In general, there should be a better way to report inaccuracies in the data.