I would like to ask for the implementation of the AsciiMath mathematical formulæ syntax, as it is more "markdown-like" and much, much easier to type.
Of course, LaTeX should continue to be supported, but in my opinion, as MarkDown main goal is to make easier to write documents, an easier syntax for math could be added to the "standard".
MathJax is good, but asciiMath is simple and covers many common scenarios, I would suggest to allow both in the Options.
Just to make a point, see the difference between TeX and asciiMath with these examples:
phi_n(kappa) = 1/(4pi^2 kappa^2)
int_0^oo (sin(kappa R))/(kappa R)
del/(del R)
[R^2 (del D_n (R))/(del R)] del R
Its not so long (112 characters, including spaces, I could've put it in a oneliner:
phi_n(kappa) = 1/(4pi^2 kappa^2) int_0^oo (sin(kappa R))/(kappa R) del/(del R) [R^2 (del D_n (R))/(del R)] del R
See the difference? And there's another one: I had only peeked at the docs to see he "name" of the 'oint'. Everything else I was able to type without help, it's "natural" (something LaTeX is definetly not ;)).
Hello!
I would like to ask for the implementation of the AsciiMath mathematical formulæ syntax, as it is more "markdown-like" and much, much easier to type.
Of course, LaTeX should continue to be supported, but in my opinion, as MarkDown main goal is to make easier to write documents, an easier syntax for math could be added to the "standard".
MathJax is good, but
asciiMath
is simple and covers many common scenarios, I would suggest to allow both in the Options.Just to make a point, see the difference between TeX and asciiMath with these examples:
\[ \left( \sum_{k=1}^n a_k b_k \right)^2 \leq \left( \sum_{k=1}^n a_k^2 \right) \left( \sum_{k=1}^n b_k^2 \right) \]
(sum_(k=1)^n a_kb_k)^2 <= (sum_(k=1)^n a_k^2) (sum_(k=1)^n b_k^2)
\dot{x} = \sigma(y-x) \\ \dot{y} = \rho x - y - xz \\ \dot{z} = -\beta z + xy
dotx = sigma(y-x)
\doty = rho x-y - xz
\dotz = -beta z + xy
\[P(E) = {n \choose k} p^k (1-p)^{ n-k } \]
P(E) = ((n),(k)) p^k (1-p)^(n-k)
-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac} \over 2a
x=-b+- sqrt(b^2-4ac)/2a
Some more examples comparing the same formulas in Markdown Plus help:
\dfrac{ \tfrac{1}{2}[1-(\tfrac{1}{2})^n] }{ 1-\tfrac{1}{2} } = s_n
(1/2[1-(1/2)^n])/(1-(1/2))=8_n
\oint_C x^3\, dx + 4y^2\, dy
oint_Cx^3 dx+4y^2 dy
2 = \left( \frac{\left(3-x\right) \times 2}{3-x} \right)
2=(((3-x)xx2)/(3-x))
\sum_{m=1}^\infty\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{m^2\,n} {3^m\left(m\,3^n+n\,3^m\right)}
sum_(m=1)^oosum_(n=1)^oo(m^2 n)/(3^m(m3^n+n3^m)
And the last one is so big (169 characters), I must put it as a code block...
And, ASCIImath version:
Its not so long (112 characters, including spaces, I could've put it in a oneliner:
phi_n(kappa) = 1/(4pi^2 kappa^2) int_0^oo (sin(kappa R))/(kappa R) del/(del R) [R^2 (del D_n (R))/(del R)] del R
See the difference? And there's another one: I had only peeked at the docs to see he "name" of the 'oint'. Everything else I was able to type without help, it's "natural" (something LaTeX is definetly not ;)).