Closed jamievicary closed 7 years ago
This seems quite complicated, hardware wise. Maybe we should go with the arduinos for now and get some experts (maybe Jenny or Jared) to think about an optimal (hardware & design) implementation.
I agree to stick with nanos for now. But why do you say this is complicated?
On 23 Jan 2017 11:30 pm, "davidreutter" notifications@github.com wrote:
This seems quite complicated, hardware wise. Maybe we should go with the arduinos for now and get some experts (maybe Jenny or Jared) to think about an optimal (hardware & design) implementation.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/jamievicary/groubit/issues/6#issuecomment-274652043, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKHHHnRDrfYXFWFl3pA3r27eD_sRw9U5ks5rVTgAgaJpZM4LrmUO .
Mainly because it says so in the article: "This project is a bit complex to build, so be sure to follow the instructions." I think it just slightly complicates our breadboard circuits to add energy supplies in the way sketched in the article.
Slightly, I agree, but worth the huge increase in battery life and the removal of an on/off switch I'd say. Something for v2.
On 23 Jan 2017 11:37 pm, "davidreutter" notifications@github.com wrote:
Mainly because it says so in the article: "This project is a bit complex to build, so be sure to follow the instructions." I think it just slightly complicates our breadboard circuits to add energy supplies in the way sketched in the article.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/jamievicary/groubit/issues/6#issuecomment-274653417, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKHHHiwv0F0lrxdEr4dMaKQtTclzbAd_ks5rVTnBgaJpZM4LrmUO .
There's a way to run it for years on just a couple of AA batteries:
https://openhomeautomation.net/arduino-battery/