I decide to comment out all the part relative to kTypeAddress case for TTValue. The reason is that is really useful to have TTAddress stored as TTSymbol inside a TTValue to not have to test the both type on an incoming value.
But this should be reviewed because in many case we should be able to decide if we expect either a TTSymbol either a TTAddress.
I decide to comment out all the part relative to kTypeAddress case for TTValue. The reason is that is really useful to have TTAddress stored as TTSymbol inside a TTValue to not have to test the both type on an incoming value.
But this should be reviewed because in many case we should be able to decide if we expect either a TTSymbol either a TTAddress.