Document the list of maintainers

jamulussoftware / jamuluswebsite

This is the GitHub Pages repository for the Jamulus main website. For the jamulus application source code, please visit jamulussoftware/jamulus.

https://jamulus.io

GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1

15 stars 81 forks source link

Document the list of maintainers #318

Closed hoffie closed 3 years ago

hoffie commented 3 years ago

I think it would be nice to see who is in charge for the Jamulus project (i.e. who can merge PRs, etc.).

Places where I would look for such a list:

A MAINTAINERS.md file in the main repository
https://github.com/orgs/jamulussoftware/people (which looks empty to me: This organization has no public members.)

ann0see commented 3 years ago

Yes. This would be great. But I think we will have to sort this out. Yesterday I took a day off and had a few things that came up my mind (after having deleted a lot of mails from here). They are related to project management/work live balance corrados’ leaving and a successful project. I think that’s another discussion ;-) but related to this.

gilgongo commented 3 years ago

Just transferring this to the website repo.

hoffie commented 3 years ago

I can move this forward if we have consensus if/what should be done.

I have looked at the Github jamulussoftware's People tab. If we wanted to have that list populated, it seems like every organization member would have to mark their membership as public when going to https://github.com/orgs/jamulussoftware/people, clicking on their own name and choosing Membership: Public. I would be in favor of doing this, but this only makes sense if everyone agrees.

I'm would only add a MAINTAINERS.md file if we are to add additional information there (i.e. full names if wanted, focus area, etc.). If we don't need this right now, it would just be a maintainance burden, so I'd skip this for now.

@ann0see @pljones @softins @gilgongo So, would you agree with

Setting your own membership to Public and
Not adding a MAINTAINERS.md file right now?

ann0see commented 3 years ago

Yes. That would be ok.

gilgongo commented 3 years ago

@hoffie Is this a duplicate? https://github.com/jamulussoftware/jamuluswebsite/issues/355

hoffie commented 3 years ago

@hoffie Is this a duplicate? #355

More or less. The decision we reached here was about publishing organization membership. Some have done that, I think @softins hasn't yet. I'd say we can close this ticket as it is superseded by #355 which is more generic and structured, yet more actionable. Feel free to close if you agree.

softins commented 3 years ago

Sorry, I missed that. I'll do it now.

gilgongo commented 3 years ago

OK cool - lets look at #355 instead.