Closed janboddez closed 4 months ago
So we'd have both options alongside eachother:
Should probably use the get_avatar_url
filter rather than the current get_avatar_html
(which should only be used for adding microformats).
Should probably use the
get_avatar_url
filter rather than the currentget_avatar_html
(which should only be used for adding microformats).
Delivered in 7f22334. Also, we never really added microformats (because adding u-photo
doesn't make sense [in this case] outside of the comment author's .h-card
, and unfortunately, the comments block normally generates the blocks/HTML that way.
Possibly related to #176.
Ideally, I'd rather not serve 3rd-party images from my domain. I'd rather "cache" them locally and serve those. And remove the cache and serve nothing, for instance, if somehow I don't want to serve a certain image at all.
But ... avatars may change over time. So, serving them through some reverse proxy of sorts might be preferred? Then if an image gets replaced, we'd automagically start serving the new image "though our proxy." And if it gets deleted, we could include a fallback option of sorts.