Open ejgallego opened 8 years ago
That seems like a nice idea. The current error messages are indeed too obscure on this point.
Dear Yaron, thanks for the comments, I'll try to provide a patch!
It's worth noting that for us to accept a patch, you need to sign the CLA: https://blogs.janestreet.com/core-icla-1_2.pdf
Noted, thanks!
This issue is as relevant now as ever. We recently revisited it, and it was mentioned that:
1) This feature has a cost: it increases the code size that comes with producing a nice error message.
2) It has an overlap with sexp_grammar
. If sexp grammar is available, then there should be enough information in that to construct a good error message from that without having to keep an extra (third) copy of the list of constructors in the binary.
So the plan is to wait until sexp_grammar is more mature and widespread and then change the error messages to use that.
Dear sexplib developers,
I am using sexplib for interactive use, and it would be great to improve the error messages for incorrect sum types to include the alternative tags.
A possibility is to extend the function
conv_error.ml:unexpected_stag
to include an optional list of valid tags. Once that is doneppx_sexp_conv
could provide this information.Do you think this could make sense? I can provide a patch (in the public domain) if you think that would make a useful improvement.
Best regards, E.