Sourcery Code Quality Report

This PR has an average code quality of 81.14%

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity		2.25 ⭐
Method Length		49.95 ⭐
Working memory		7.55 🙂
Quality	%	81.14% ⭐	%

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines		840

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
src/superintendent/base.py	%	81.97% ⭐	%
src/superintendent/acquisition_functions/init.py	%	73.16% 🙂	%
src/superintendent/acquisition_functions/decorators.py	%	78.34% ⭐	%
src/superintendent/acquisition_functions/functions.py	%	88.29% ⭐	%
src/superintendent/experiments/init.py	%	77.33% ⭐	%

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
src/superintendent/base.py	Labeller.__init__	7 ⭐	296 ⛔	21 ⛔	33.59% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
src/superintendent/base.py	Labeller.retrain	9 🙂	206 ⛔	15 😞	41.30% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
src/superintendent/acquisition_functions/decorators.py	make_acquisition_function	13 🙂	120 😞	15 😞	46.13% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
src/superintendent/acquisition_functions/decorators.py	make_acquisition_function.decorator	10 🙂	113 🙂	15 😞	49.69% 😞	Extract out complex expressions
src/superintendent/acquisition_functions/decorators.py	_is_multioutput	4 ⭐	54 ⭐	15 😞	63.99% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Let us know what you think of it by mentioning @sourcery-ai in a comment.