Closed bwalker000 closed 2 years ago
For impedance matching it is sometimes valuable to see a graph of R + jX as a function of frequency.
Do you mean two different graphs, one for the real part and one for the imaginary part across frequency? Otherwise I don't know how you could show a complex value on a two-dimensional graph.
This is partially possible (for the real part):
There is no option yet to see the imaginary part. You can show the data as capacitance/inductance, which is calculated from that, but viewing the imaginary part directly is not supported yet. But I think this should only be a small change, I will try to integrate it soon.
You are exactly right. It would be two graphs, one for R and one for X. Helpful if they are on the same axis. Thank you!
Okay, this is implemented now. You have additional options for Real (R) and Imaginary (X) on the Y-axis. If you want both of them on the same graph, you can select one of them for the primary (left) and the other for the secondary (right) Y-axis.
I think @bwalker000 was looking for impedance R+jX (that is, resistance/reactance in ohms), not complex S11. The resistance is already there, as you say, the reactance isn't. Perhaps https://github.com/jankae/LibreVNA/pull/50 would do?
(The Smith chart displays these exact values, but a lot of people like a rectangular plot in that format).
Yes, that makes a lot of sense. Thank you for the PR, I just merged it with one tiny modification (only allowing reactance for reflection measurements, not for S12/S21)
I just tested the new build. This looks great and is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks again.
For impedance matching it is sometimes valuable to see a graph of R + jX as a function of frequency.
This is for S11 measurements.
This should be a simple matter of slicing the existing data in a different way.
BTW, thank you for having a working OSX port. So often projects pay lip-service to OSX support, without really delivering.