soc-se-bot
commented
4 months ago Team's Response
Both are about alignment issue in use case 1.
The 'Original' Bug
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
Incorrect formatting for uc1 step 3a
Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.
Steps 3a2 and 3a3 are not aligned coorectly.This is problematic as users cannot read the documentation easily.
[original: nus-cs2103-AY2324S2/pe-interim#3026] [original labels: type.DocumentationBug severity.VeryLow]
Their Response to the 'Original' Bug
[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]
No details provided by team.
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue duplicate status
Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)
- [x] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: Sure yes, they are both similar issues from use case 1 but they are not the exact same bug.
Fixing the alignment for step 3a in bug 17 will not automatically fix the alignment for step 3b in bug 16. There are separate lines that both need to add their own individual break statements to be fixed. These are bugs that must be fixed independently.
Thus, these are not duplicate issues.
Steps 3b2 is not aligned coorectly.
This is problematic as users cannot read the documentation easily.