Closed ResonWang closed 4 years ago
Dear Tony, Thanks for your interest. I think the paper does talk about it, I'm quoting from the abstract below:
First, we gather a lung ultrasound (POCUS) dataset consisting of (currently) 1103 images
(654 COVID-19, 277 bacterial pneumonia and 172 healthy controls), sampled from 64 videos.
Hence, pneumonia is short for forms of bacterial pneumonia. However, the dataset grew significantly since we put that manuscript out. Please follow the READMEs of this repo, especially the one on data\
. The dataset sizes are much bigger now than what we report in the initial manuscript. Plus, we now also have a couple of videos from non-covid-viral-pneumonia, so if you want, you can include a 4-th class into your model.
Got it, thanks!
I close this issue then, please feel free to re-open if applicable.
OK
------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "Jannis Born"<notifications@github.com>; 发送时间: 2020年7月10日(星期五) 下午3:22 收件人: "jannisborn/covid19_pocus_ultrasound"<covid19_pocus_ultrasound@noreply.github.com>; 抄送: "WRX"<907932614@qq.com>; "Author"<author@noreply.github.com>; 主题: Re: [jannisborn/covid19_pocus_ultrasound] A little confusion (#42)
I close this issue then, please feel free to re-open if applicable.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
It's said that Covid-19 belongs to one kind of viral pneumonia. So I am a little confused about the difference between class Covid-19 and class pneumonia in the classification. It seems that the paper hasn't talk about it.