Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I understand, but does it really make sense to accept /0 as a valid prefix
length? As you say, any address will be contained in this network... so I don't
immediately see the use case.
I'll have a look to see if there are reasons why I excluded /0 in the first
place.
Original comment by janvanbesien@gmail.com
on 1 Feb 2013 at 11:43
I didn't see any additional problems, so I added support for /0 prefix length
in trunk. I didn't make a new release yet. Are you in a position to try out the
fix by building a new binary yourself? I'll see to creating a release beginning
next week.
Original comment by janvanbesien@gmail.com
on 1 Feb 2013 at 12:47
Thanks for your fix - i will try it out next week, cant do it earlier sorry.
The reason for /0 is basically - im using it for verifying some firewall rules
and need to verify if a specific IP address is within a network - its a list of
networks so it could be that it contains the default one too.
Original comment by harakiri...@yahoo.com
on 2 Feb 2013 at 10:44
I tested it, and it works fine for my testcases.
Thanks
Original comment by harakiri...@yahoo.com
on 4 Feb 2013 at 10:40
released 0.9. Should be in maven central repository later today.
Original comment by janvanbesien@gmail.com
on 5 Feb 2013 at 9:30
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
harakiri...@yahoo.com
on 1 Feb 2013 at 11:26