Closed ValWood closed 1 year ago
Do we want Canto stuff on the Canto tracker with a japonicus label?
Obviously only for future. existing ones can easily be filtered as "wrong organism".
and "Sicyopterus japonicus" "Stichopus japonicus" "Synagrops japonicus" "styrax macrocarpus" "Styrax japonicus" "Stichopus japonicus" "Sea cucumber" "Semanotus japonicus"
Do we want Canto stuff on the Canto tracker with a japonicus label?
Let's keep it separate unless there's a Canto bug that need fixing.
I did some testing with those filters added. And I also changed "Schizosaccharomyces japonicus"
to ("Schizosaccharomyces" AND "japonicus")
which picks up a few extra papers.
There are still a few false positives.
One of the extra papers is: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26263485/ Which wasn't picked up by our initial query using "Schizosaccharomyces japonicus" because of a typo in the abstract:
Recent work on another member of the same genus, Schisozaccharomyces japonicus, suggests that ...
Whoops.
Whoops indeed!
False positive are inevitable, and this isn't a big deal because the number of papers makes triage easy anyway. I get many FP for pombe.
So if Snezka agrees that all the papers are in this list we con continue with this search string. I can't imagine this string would miss any future papers and if it did they can be added manually.
I am sure we are missing some pombe ones. Sometimes people forget to mention the organism in the title, abstract or keywords (more often than you would imagine!)
I think we can close this?
I haven't made a script to do this nightly yet.
I haven't made a script to do this nightly yet.
Done! It didn't need a script, just a cron entry.
add NOT Scomber. japonicus to Canto publication loading