search

jaredballou / confogl

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/confogl
1 stars 0 forks source link

Autoloader is Bad #132

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
The current version of the autoloader has poor functionality.  It seems to be 
buggy based on reports and doesn't allow loading a different config.

Goals:
1) Make the autoloader load the specified config correctly if the server is not 
in match mode and is in versus/teamversus.
2) Allow the players to vote for a new config if they want. (Ex currently 
running standard Confogl, but want to do !match 2v2 to play a 2v2)
3) Allow Confogl to be completely disabled until all players disconnect from 
the server, then return to standard function.
4) Possibly include as a module in Confogl instead of a standalone plugin.

If anything has been missed, reply with what it is.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Canada.R...@gmail.com on 13 Jan 2011 at 8:51

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Issue 127 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by Canada.R...@gmail.com on 13 Jan 2011 at 8:54

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Issue 117 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by Canada.R...@gmail.com on 13 Jan 2011 at 8:55

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Issue 107 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by Canada.R...@gmail.com on 13 Jan 2011 at 8:55

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Honestly, "autoloading," "match," and "config" functionality (including voting, 
etc, etc) should be their own module--and their own plugin.

This is what LGOFNOC was supposed to be I suppose. League and Gaming 
Organization Framework for Open and Normalized Configuration.

Write basic config/match/voting functionality as a separate plugin, include 
natives for config path building, if necessary (or just try not to use extra 
config files, use commands/cvar only). Then Confogl becomes Lgofnoc + 
confoglcompmod.

Original comment by prodigysim@gmail.com on 13 Jan 2011 at 9:33

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Yeah, but that is a lot more work =P

Original comment by Canada.R...@gmail.com on 13 Jan 2011 at 10:06

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
1) Complete
2) Complete
3) Not yet
4) Integrated into ReqMatch because that module isn't confusing enough!!

Original comment by Canada.R...@gmail.com on 15 Jan 2011 at 4:42