dataset

[SZH1230456]

I have read the DeepSurv paper but find some differences in the datasets. In WHAS, I run the code finding that there are 6 features to be used but 5 features mentioned iin the paper; In SUPPORT, there are 8873 patients indluded in the code but 9105 in the paper. Also in METABRIC, it contains 1904 patients in the code but 1980 patients in the paper.I'm confused about it and could you replace the datasets which consisit with the paper?

[MineOgre]

Also, the number of features in METABRIC dataset is reported as 14 in the paper, however, there are 9 in the dataset here.

[Huaichao2018]

Also, the number of features in METABRIC dataset is reported as 14 in the paper, however, there are 9 in the dataset here.

do you have run the code successfully

[MineOgre]

Also, the number of features in METABRIC dataset is reported as 14 in the paper, however, there are 9 in the dataset here.

do you have run the code successfully

No, I did not work on the code much.

[Huaichao2018]

thank you for your reply

Huaichao Luo
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Sichuan, China.

2020-01-29

On 01/21/2020 22:20，Minenotifications@github.com wrote：

Also, the number of features in METABRIC dataset is reported as 14 in the paper, however, there are 9 in the dataset here.

do you have run the code successfully

No, I did not work on the code much.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

[cwzhou]

Hello, I was wondering if this question was answered somewhere. I am also confused about the datasets. In addition to the question by SZH1230456, the 8 of the 9 variables in METABRIC are stated in the paper to be indicators, but the dataset provided only has 4 indicators. Could you please clarify?

Thank you!