Closed sandor closed 3 years ago
I'm unable to reproduce this bug. Could you please provide some sample code (without framework-specific stuff)?
Sorry Jarek! My big problem is, that I still have to use some framework specific stuff to describe the issue, since I am working with some Fabric.js canvas elements (and as always with AngularJS – sorry!). Recreating a test case without this frameworks will not be of use for my case – especially if you are not able to reproduce the case without using framework stuff.
Not sure if such a case can even be recreated without a framework:
Does this making sense?
@jarek-foksa – I have found a solution for this problem. I was writing the specific value like this:
angle: 0,
Writing the value like this will solve the problem:
angle: '0',
You can close the issue if you like – unless it is still relevant...
As far as I'm concerned, I have no plans for working on issues that require digging into the internals of Angular. But let's keep this open in case someone else is interested in fixing it.
Yeah, it is OK and I understand totally that you don't have any plans (or time) to do something angular specific here. Just hope that it is OK when I post/ask something that is not so clearly Angular specific (or some other stupid stuff that a non-coder like me can ask). So please: if the question or the post is to stupid – just ignore it. :-)
As long as the issue is somehow related to Xel and states the problem clearly I'm perfectly fine with it. When I ignore a question, it's usually because I don't know the answer.
OK, so we are cool. Just have some patience with me please :-)
Xel project underwent a major rewrite recently. If you can still reproduce this bug, please report it on https://xel-toolkit.org/issues.
I am getting and setting the values for my x-numberinput with JS. Working fine when I get values like 1,2,3 ... 100 etc. (also no problem with negative values. But when I am receiving "0" (zero) the value is not displayed in the x-numberinput. Typing manually "0" in the input ist working. I think I am missing something obvious... ?