[JSON-LD Context]: proper definitions for JSON-LD Context

kshychko commented 1 month ago

Current JSON-LD Context file doesn't align with what it supposed to be and can't be used to define a context for JSON documents. The following changes need to be applied:

[x] Root @context defines namespaces used in the file #12
[x] Root @context includes id, type, @version #13
[x] Root @context defines root type (a class with [jargon.jsonLdContext]=true) #14
[x] owl:ObjectProperty @id refers to ontology definition ('@id' in ontology) #15
[x] owl:ObjectProperty @type refers to @id
[x] owl:DataProperty @id refers to ontology definition ('@id' in ontology)
[x] owl:DataProperty @type refers to data type ("schema:rangeIncludes"."@id" in ontology) #16
[ ] owl:ObjectProperty @type is set to @vocab when "schema:rangeIncludes"."@id" is a code list #17
[ ] if "@type" : "@vocab" a code list is linked as an inner "@context": {"@vocab": "https://...."}

kshychko commented 1 month ago

For the reference the following DPP links can be used:

the test endpoint https://test.uncefact.org/vocabulary/untp/dpp/dpp-context.jsonld - JSON-LD context https://test.uncefact.org/vocabulary/untp/dpp/dpp.jsonld - JSON-LD vocabulary an example

jargon-sh commented 1 month ago

Thanks for all this @kshychko

I've had a look and think I've addressed all the json-ld context changes.

I've re-generated the DPP context.

Please review and close any of the specific issues you think are addressed, or add comments to them if you spot any problems.

kshychko commented 1 month ago

@jargon-sh , all good except external code lists, but it looks like it is depending on #9

jargon-sh / issues

[JSON-LD Context]: proper definitions for JSON-LD Context #6