Closed jarikomppa closed 10 years ago
Hi,
I think that this project is going to bloat now. I do like SFXR, but I think it would be better if there was just an optional interface. Or do I misunderstand something?
Bye, -Gernot
From: Jari Komppa Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 11:35 AM To: jarikomppa/soloud Subject: [soloud] integrate sfxr (#29) The author of sfxr gave us permission to re-license sfxr under zlib/libpng license, so do so and integrate sfxr as an audio source.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
Hi,
Everything but the core is optional. Audio sources won't add bloat.
Cheers, Jari
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:37 PM, KungPhoo notifications@github.com wrote:
Hi,
I think that this project is going to bloat now. I do like SFXR, but I think it would be better if there was just an optional interface. Or do I misunderstand something?
Bye, -Gernot
From: Jari Komppa Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 11:35 AM To: jarikomppa/soloud Subject: [soloud] integrate sfxr (#29) The author of sfxr gave us permission to re-license sfxr under zlib/libpng license, so do so and integrate sfxr as an audio source.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jarikomppa/soloud/issues/29#issuecomment-26891759 .
(Except, of course, if you use the DLL, but in that case, you probably don't mind bloat in any case..)
The author of sfxr gave us permission to re-license sfxr under zlib/libpng license, so do so and integrate sfxr as an audio source.