jashkenas / ruby-processing

Code as Art, Art as Code. Processing and Ruby are meant for each other.
http://github.com/jashkenas/ruby-processing/wikis
Other
1.28k stars 94 forks source link

Output after 'gem install ruby-processing' #64

Closed ghost closed 11 years ago

ghost commented 11 years ago

% gem install ruby-processing Fetching: ruby-processing-1.0.11.gem (100%) Successfully installed ruby-processing-1.0.11 1 gem installed Installing ri documentation for ruby-processing-1.0.11... unable to convert "\xCA" from ASCII-8BIT to UTF-8 for lib/templates/application/Contents/MacOS/JavaApplicationStub, skipping Installing RDoc documentation for ruby-processing-1.0.11... unable to convert "\xCA" from ASCII-8BIT to UTF-8 for lib/templates/application/Contents/MacOS/JavaApplicationStub, skipping

Mac OS 10.8.4 / Ruby 1.9.3 / Java 1.7

monkstone commented 11 years ago

I would say just ignore it, just try:-


rp5 unpack samples
rp5 run samples/contributed/jwishy.rb

If sketch doesn't run you have a problem... I have no intention of supporting ruby-processing-1.0.11, as I am concentrating on developing the latest version of ruby-processing, perhaps someone else has ideas?

ghost commented 11 years ago

I have no problem running the examples sketches.

monkstone commented 11 years ago

Then I don't think you should have any issues, however if you've got a half decent graphics card I would encourage you to try the development version as an automated build here:-


git clone https://github.com/jashkenas/ruby-processing.git
cd ruby-processing
rake (to build and test)
rake install (to install locally may need sudo for system install)

Reported as working on MacOSX, you will then be up to date with processing-2.0.1 and JRuby-1.7.4, and there are loads more worked examples. Sketches from other sources will probably need updating, but I am only too pleased to set you in the right direction. You can keep the old version installed as backup if you don't like the new version (syntax for new version = ruby-1.9).

ghost commented 11 years ago

Ok, thank you! I will try the new version.