Open jgonggrijp opened 4 years ago
The following expression is useless, since you'd expect the second chain call to just return a new wrapper of the same value:
chain
_.chain([1]).chain()
but rather than behaving like a no-op, it results in a stack overflow. Credits to @reubenrybnik for pointing this out in https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/pull/45201#issuecomment-637696652. This minor pitfall might have been introduced with #1691.
I'm hesitant to give this a "bug" label as it is rather non-urgent, but technically it's a bug. Documenting in an issue ticket for reference.
The following expression is useless, since you'd expect the second
chaincall to just return a new wrapper of the same value:but rather than behaving like a no-op, it results in a stack overflow. Credits to @reubenrybnik for pointing this out in https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/pull/45201#issuecomment-637696652. This minor pitfall might have been introduced with #1691.
I'm hesitant to give this a "bug" label as it is rather non-urgent, but technically it's a bug. Documenting in an issue ticket for reference.