Closed mohammadali-seifkashani closed 3 years ago
OH I made a mistake. More than mistake. In this PR and #2898 mistakenly I pulled request for irrelevant issue. I'm sorry :(
@mohammadali-seifkashani It's alright. Please do feel welcome to continue #2897.
@mohammadali-seifkashani Thank you for your continued efforts.
I can tell that you meant to follow up on my comments in #2897, but you applied them to your
findKeys
implementation instead of yourtransition
implementation. I asked you in #2898 to not mix these features. Since #2681 already has a good implementation offindKeys
, I would strongly recommend that you focus all your effort ontransition
.You can fix this as follows:
git checkout 2850
.git reset --hard fc3d6a0
: this will remove the commits related tofindKeys
from your2850
branch. Don't worry, thefindKeys
commits are still on your2676
branch.findKeys
is really gone. If it's still there, delete it manually.npm run install
: this will install commit hooks that ensure that theunderscore.js
and theunderscore-esm.js
bundles stay in sync with the source code. I can tell from the current PR that you haven't done this yet.transition
. Commit your changes.npm run test
: if any test fails, fix your code and commit again.git push --force
.At this point, the current PR (#2904) should only contain your
transition
-related contributions. After this, I'll do a detailed code review over here. You don't need to open another PR. Thanks in advance!