Hi @jason-johnson great work on taking this over and including the recommended service connections/Managed workload identities.
I want to use this in my organisation, however we have a large number of Repo's that use the previous owners task.
It'll be a large migration task to do in one hit. How would you feel about versioning this packages task so that people can run both charleszipp, and your package side by side and make the migration process easer?
edit: just tried experimenting with @1/@2, but looks like that ambiguity comes from the selection of the task across 2 different extensions - so can't be fixed.
Hi @jason-johnson great work on taking this over and including the recommended service connections/Managed workload identities.
I want to use this in my organisation, however we have a large number of Repo's that use the previous owners task.
It'll be a large migration task to do in one hit. How would you feel about versioning this packages task so that people can run both charleszipp, and your package side by side and make the migration process easer?
edit: just tried experimenting with @1/@2, but looks like that ambiguity comes from the selection of the task across 2 different extensions - so can't be fixed.