search

jasonkyuyim / se3_diffusion

Implementation for SE(3) diffusion model with application to protein backbone generation
https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.02277
MIT License
333 stars 54 forks source link

A question on SO(3) equivariance #39

Open wzm2256 opened 6 months ago

wzm2256 commented 6 months ago

Thanks for the amazing work! I wish to ask two questions regarding the SO(3) equivariance.

If I understand it correctly:

  1. The element in $SE(3)_0^N$ is like $((r_1, t_1), ... (r_n, t_n))$ where $\sum t =0$ as defined in the paragraph above prop.3.5. However, $SE(3)_0^N$ is not even a group when $N>1$ (when $N=1$, $SE(3)_0^N$ is just $SO(3)$), because the mutiplication is not even closed. In other words, it is not a Lie group as claimed in the paper, right?
  2. A related problem is in Eqn 6, where the diffusion term is PB(t), where P is matrix depending on X, My question is how to derive the reverse process. The paper claims to use Prop 2.1, but it is different from Eqn 6, because there is no matrix P there.

Thanks for your help!