GoogleCodeExporter
commented
9 years ago Test rand fails with stride1 optionOriginal comment by dan.djc...@gmail.com on 28 Jul 2010 at 12:48
Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
9 years ago Test rand fails with stride1 optionOriginal comment by dan.djc...@gmail.com on 28 Jul 2010 at 12:48
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
9 years ago Current Single Precision Tests with Errors:
t0-default-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t0-default-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t0-default-2_2-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t0-default-3_2-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t0-default-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t0-even-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t0-even-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t0-even-2_2-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t0-even-2_3-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t0-even-3_2-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t0-even-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t0-even-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t0-even-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_f.x.log: Results are incorrect
t0-even-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t0-even-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_f.x.log: Results are incorrect
t0-even-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t0-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t0-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_f.x.log: Results are incorrect
t0-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t0-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_f.x.log: Results are incorrect
t0-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_c.x.log:Results are incorrectOriginal comment by dan.djc...@gmail.com on 28 Jul 2010 at 1:00
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
9 years ago t1-even-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_c.x.log
Single precision
(128 128 128) grid
2 proc. dimensions
1 repetitions
Reading proc. grid from file dims
Using processor grid 4 x 1
Using stride-1 layout
Using loop block sizes 16 128 16 1
Iteration 0
Result of forward transform
(0,1,1) 1048849.250000 0.000000
Results are incorrect
max diff =131750
Time per loop=0.030684
timer[1] (avg/max/min): 2.688944E-03 3.273964E-03 2.456903E-03
timer[2] (avg/max/min): 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
timer[3] (avg/max/min): 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
timer[4] (avg/max/min): 2.362788E-03 2.728939E-03 1.680136E-03
timer[5] (avg/max/min): 3.346443E-03 3.381014E-03 3.306866E-03
timer[6] (avg/max/min): 2.677143E-03 2.856255E-03 2.297163E-03
timer[7] (avg/max/min): 2.656460E-03 2.788067E-03 2.601862E-03
timer[8] (avg/max/min): 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
timer[9] (avg/max/min): 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
timer[10] (avg/max/min): 2.700806E-03 2.835989E-03 2.620935E-03
timer[11] (avg/max/min): 1.893103E-03 2.171755E-03 1.754045E-03
timer[12] (avg/max/min): 2.343535E-03 2.411127E-03 2.291918E-03
Original comment by dan.djc...@gmail.com on 2 Aug 2010 at 10:39
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
9 years ago t1-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_c.x.log
Single precision
(128 128 128) grid
2 proc. dimensions
1 repetitions
Reading proc. grid from file dims
Using processor grid 4 x 1
Using stride-1 layout
Using loop block sizes 16 128 16 1
Iteration 0
Result of forward transform
(0,1,1) 1048849.250000 0.000000
Results are incorrect
max diff =132102
Time per loop=0.031903
timer[1] (avg/max/min): 4.468679E-03 4.515886E-03 4.443884E-03
timer[2] (avg/max/min): 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
timer[3] (avg/max/min): 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
timer[4] (avg/max/min): 2.073526E-03 2.447844E-03 1.199007E-03
timer[5] (avg/max/min): 3.363490E-03 3.386974E-03 3.334045E-03
timer[6] (avg/max/min): 2.166867E-03 2.460003E-03 1.974106E-03
timer[7] (avg/max/min): 2.678514E-03 2.797127E-03 2.626896E-03
timer[8] (avg/max/min): 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
timer[9] (avg/max/min): 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
timer[10] (avg/max/min): 2.698004E-03 2.820969E-03 2.624035E-03
timer[11] (avg/max/min): 2.020538E-03 2.459049E-03 1.811266E-03
timer[12] (avg/max/min): 2.327502E-03 2.377033E-03 2.280951E-03
Original comment by dan.djc...@gmail.com on 2 Aug 2010 at 10:40
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
9 years ago Error output:
0: DEALLOCATE: memory at 0xfa6fb00 not allocated
0: DEALLOCATE: memory at 0xb4fd7a0 not allocated
0: DEALLOCATE: memory at 0x124c77a0 not allocated
0: DEALLOCATE: memory at 0xf64a7a0 not allocated
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mpirun has exited due to process rank 2 with PID 16734 on
node tcc-5-40.local exiting without calling "finalize". This may
have caused other processes in the application to be
terminated by signals sent by mpirun (as reported here).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0: DEALLOCATE: memory at 0x137abd30 not allocated
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mpirun has exited due to process rank 0 with PID 16761 on
node tcc-5-40.local exiting without calling "finalize". This may
have caused other processes in the application to be
terminated by signals sent by mpirun (as reported here).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0: DEALLOCATE: memory at 0x7dab3d0 not allocated
0: DEALLOCATE: memory at 0x2897590 not allocated
0: DEALLOCATE: memory at 0x13b52dc0 not allocated
0: DEALLOCATE: memory at 0xbf41f30 not allocated
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mpirun has exited due to process rank 2 with PID 16823 on
node tcc-5-40.local exiting without calling "finalize". This may
have caused other processes in the application to be
terminated by signals sent by mpirun (as reported here).
Original comment by dan.djc...@gmail.com on 2 Aug 2010 at 10:41
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
9 years ago Double Precision Tests
t0-even-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_c.x.log
Double precision
(128 128 128) grid
2 proc. dimensions
1 repetitions
Reading proc. grid from file dims
Using processor grid 4 x 1
Using stride-1 layout
Using loop block sizes 8 64 8 1
Iteration 0
Result of forward transform
(0,1,1) 1048849.244637 0.000000
Results are incorrect
max diff =484.063
Time per loop=0.0507381
timer[1] (avg/max/min): 5.283058E-03 6.535053E-03 4.678011E-03
timer[2] (avg/max/min): 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
timer[3] (avg/max/min): 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
timer[4] (avg/max/min): 3.875554E-03 4.608154E-03 3.593206E-03
timer[5] (avg/max/min): 4.960954E-03 5.076170E-03 4.830837E-03
timer[6] (avg/max/min): 5.984962E-03 6.651878E-03 4.894972E-03
timer[7] (avg/max/min): 3.679752E-03 3.700018E-03 3.624916E-03
timer[8] (avg/max/min): 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
timer[9] (avg/max/min): 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
timer[10] (avg/max/min): 3.675103E-03 3.744125E-03 3.590107E-03
timer[11] (avg/max/min): 5.171597E-03 5.561113E-03 4.532814E-03
timer[12] (avg/max/min): 3.423214E-03 3.645897E-03 3.257990E-03
t0-even-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_f.x.log
Reading from input file stdin
procs= 4 nx= 128 ny= 128 nz= 128
ndim= 2 repeat= 1
Double precision version
Reading proc. grid from file dims
Using processor grid 4 x 1
Using stride-1 layout
Using loop block sizes 8 64 8 1
Iteration 1
Results are incorrect
max diff = 0.1619414035733964
proc_id, cpu time per loop 0 5.1174879074096680E-002
timer 1 (avg/max/min): 5.3152441978454590E-003
6.6339969635009766E-003 4.7290325164794922E-003
timer 2 (avg/max/min): 0.000000000000000
0.000000000000000 0.000000000000000
timer 3 (avg/max/min): 0.000000000000000
0.000000000000000 0.000000000000000
timer 4 (avg/max/min): 3.8710236549377441E-003
4.4670104980468750E-003 3.6571025848388672E-003
timer 5 (avg/max/min): 4.7414898872375488E-003
4.8289299011230469E-003 4.5819282531738281E-003
timer 6 (avg/max/min): 5.9511661529541016E-003
6.6421031951904297E-003 4.8677921295166016E-003
timer 7 (avg/max/min): 3.6205053329467773E-003
3.6540031433105469E-003 3.5769939422607422E-003
timer 8 (avg/max/min): 0.000000000000000
0.000000000000000 0.000000000000000
timer 9 (avg/max/min): 0.000000000000000
0.000000000000000 0.000000000000000
timer 10 (avg/max/min): 3.5737752914428711E-003
3.6342144012451172E-003 3.4608840942382812E-003
Total comm (avg/max/min): 9.1862678527832031E-003 1.0320901870727539E-002
8.3861351013183594E-003
Original comment by dan.djc...@gmail.com on 2 Aug 2010 at 10:52
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
9 years ago t0-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_c.x.log
Double precision
(128 128 128) grid
2 proc. dimensions
1 repetitions
Reading proc. grid from file dims
Using processor grid 4 x 1
Using stride-1 layout
Using loop block sizes 8 64 8 1
Iteration 0
Result of forward transform
(0,1,1) 1048849.244637 0.000000
Results are incorrect
max diff =484.063
Time per loop=0.0526519
timer[1] (avg/max/min): 6.742418E-03 6.912947E-03 6.577969E-03
timer[2] (avg/max/min): 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
timer[3] (avg/max/min): 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
timer[4] (avg/max/min): 4.135966E-03 4.755974E-03 2.843857E-03
timer[5] (avg/max/min): 4.983544E-03 5.064964E-03 4.872084E-03
timer[6] (avg/max/min): 5.391777E-03 5.990028E-03 4.965067E-03
timer[7] (avg/max/min): 3.603220E-03 3.772020E-03 3.496885E-03
timer[8] (avg/max/min): 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
timer[9] (avg/max/min): 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
timer[10] (avg/max/min): 3.588974E-03 3.842115E-03 3.478050E-03
timer[11] (avg/max/min): 5.404830E-03 6.165266E-03 4.925966E-03
timer[12] (avg/max/min): 3.434002E-03 3.537893E-03 3.303051E-03
Original comment by dan.djc...@gmail.com on 2 Aug 2010 at 10:54
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
9 years ago t0-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_f.x.log
Reading from input file stdin
procs= 4 nx= 128 ny= 128 nz= 128
ndim= 2 repeat= 1
Double precision version
Reading proc. grid from file dims
Using processor grid 4 x 1
Using stride-1 layout
Using loop block sizes 8 64 8 1
Iteration 1
Results are incorrect
max diff = 0.1619414035733964
proc_id, cpu time per loop 0 5.1547288894653320E-002
timer 1 (avg/max/min): 6.6261887550354004E-003
6.8130493164062500E-003 6.5019130706787109E-003
timer 2 (avg/max/min): 0.000000000000000
0.000000000000000 0.000000000000000
timer 3 (avg/max/min): 0.000000000000000
0.000000000000000 0.000000000000000
timer 4 (avg/max/min): 3.6915540695190430E-003
4.2741298675537109E-003 3.3750534057617188E-003
timer 5 (avg/max/min): 4.7464370727539062E-003
4.8148632049560547E-003 4.6269893646240234E-003
timer 6 (avg/max/min): 5.3738355636596680E-003
5.6419372558593750E-003 4.9951076507568359E-003
timer 7 (avg/max/min): 3.5877823829650879E-003
3.7050247192382812E-003 3.5271644592285156E-003
timer 8 (avg/max/min): 0.000000000000000
0.000000000000000 0.000000000000000
timer 9 (avg/max/min): 0.000000000000000
0.000000000000000 0.000000000000000
timer 10 (avg/max/min): 3.5287737846374512E-003
3.6509037017822266E-003 3.4391880035400391E-003
Total comm (avg/max/min): 1.0317742824554443E-002 1.0909080505371094E-002
1.0050773620605469E-002Original comment by dan.djc...@gmail.com on 2 Aug 2010 at 10:54
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
9 years ago Current tests failing to complete (usually segfault)
t0-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_c.x ERROR
t0-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_c.x ERROR
t0-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_f.x ERROR
t0-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_f.x ERROR
t0-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_c.x ERROR
t0-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_c.x ERROR
t0-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_f.x ERROR
t0-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_f.x ERROR
t0-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_inplace_c.x ERROR
t0-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_inplace_c.x ERROR
t0-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_inplace_f.x ERROR
t0-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_inplace_f.x ERROR
t0-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_spec_f.x ERROR
t0-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_spec_f.x ERROR
t0-even-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_c.x ERROR
t0-even-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_c.x ERROR
t0-even-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_f.x ERROR
t0-even-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_f.x ERROR
t0-even-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_c.x ERROR
t0-even-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_c.x ERROR
t0-even-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_f.x ERROR
t0-even-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_f.x ERROR
t0-even-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_inplace_c.x ERROR
t0-even-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_inplace_c.x ERROR
t0-even-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_inplace_f.x ERROR
t0-even-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_inplace_f.x ERROR
t0-even-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_spec_f.x ERROR
t0-even-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_spec_f.x ERROR
t1-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_c.x ERROR
t1-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_c.x ERROR
t1-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_f.x ERROR
t1-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_f.x ERROR
t1-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_c.x ERROR
t1-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_c.x ERROR
t1-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_f.x ERROR
t1-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_f.x ERROR
t1-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_inplace_c.x ERROR
t1-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_inplace_c.x ERROR
t1-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_inplace_f.x ERROR
t1-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_inplace_f.x ERROR
t1-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_spec_f.x ERROR
t1-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_spec_f.x ERROR
t1-even-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_c.x ERROR
t1-even-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_c.x ERROR
t1-even-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_f.x ERROR
t1-even-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_f.x ERROR
t1-even-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_c.x ERROR
t1-even-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_c.x ERROR
t1-even-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_f.x ERROR
t1-even-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_f.x ERROR
t1-even-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_inplace_c.x ERROR
t1-even-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_inplace_c.x ERROR
t1-even-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_inplace_f.x ERROR
t1-even-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_sine_inplace_f.x ERROR
t1-even-stride1-1_4-128_128_128_2_1-test_spec_f.x ERROR
t1-even-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_spec_f.x ERROROriginal comment by dan.djc...@gmail.com on 4 Aug 2010 at 5:55
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
9 years ago Current tests returning incorrect results:
t0-even-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t0-even-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_f.x.log: Results are incorrect
t0-even-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t0-even-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_f.x.log: Results are incorrect
t0-even-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t0-even-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_f.x.log: Results are incorrect
t0-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t0-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_f.x.log: Results are incorrect
t0-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t0-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_f.x.log: Results are incorrect
t0-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t0-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_f.x.log: Results are incorrect
t1-even-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t1-even-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_f.x.log: Results are incorrect
t1-even-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t1-even-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_f.x.log: Results are incorrect
t1-even-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t1-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t1-stride1-1_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_f.x.log: Results are incorrect
t1-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_c.x.log:Results are incorrect
t1-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_inverse_f.x.log: Results are incorrect
t1-stride1-4_1-128_128_128_2_1-test_rand_c.x.log:Results are incorrectOriginal comment by dan.djc...@gmail.com on 4 Aug 2010 at 5:56
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
9 years ago Example failing test:
]$ mpirun -np 4 test_rand_c.x
Double precision
(128 128 128) grid
2 proc. dimensions
1 repetitions
Reading proc. grid from file dims
Using processor grid 1 x 4
Using stride-1 layout
Using loop block sizes 8 15 8 1
Iteration 0
Result of forward transform
(1,1,1) 1048849.244637224 0
[login-4-0:15324] *** Process received signal ***
[login-4-0:15324] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
[login-4-0:15324] Signal code: (128)
[login-4-0:15324] Failing at address: (nil)
[login-4-0:15325] *** Process received signal ***
[login-4-0:15325] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
[login-4-0:15325] Signal code: (128)
[login-4-0:15325] Failing at address: (nil)
[login-4-0:15325] *** End of error message ***
[login-4-0:15324] *** End of error message ***
[login-4-0:15322] *** Process received signal ***
[login-4-0:15322] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
[login-4-0:15322] Signal code: (128)
[login-4-0:15322] Failing at address: (nil)
[login-4-0:15322] *** End of error message ***
[login-4-0:15323] *** Process received signal ***
[login-4-0:15323] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
[login-4-0:15323] Signal code: (128)
[login-4-0:15323] Failing at address: (nil)
[login-4-0:15323] *** End of error message ***
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mpirun noticed that process rank 0 with PID 15322 on node login-4-0.local
exited on signal 11 (Segmentation fault).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------Original comment by dan.djc...@gmail.com on 4 Aug 2010 at 5:58
GoogleCodeExporter
commented
9 years ago Original comment by dan.djc...@gmail.com on 9 Aug 2010 at 11:20
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
dan.djc...@gmail.comon 28 Jul 2010 at 12:46