search

jasp-stats / jasp-issues

This repository is solely meant for reporting of bugs, feature requests and other issues in JASP.
59 stars 29 forks source link

Bayes Factor/Bayesian MANOVA pretty please - it will be huge and revolutionary! #132

Open cgiannoulis opened 6 years ago

cgiannoulis commented 6 years ago

Template for bug reports

Template for enhancement requests

* Enhancement: Bayesian MANOVA * Purpose: It is missing - it will be pioneering it will help do more inferential analyses Thank you so very much for all what you do and the truly amazing work!
boutinb commented 6 years ago

This is a duplicate of #1832 @AlexanderLyNL #1832 is on your name, do you plan to implement it?

EJWagenmakers commented 6 years ago

This is for the future. I don't think we should assign this to anybody yet. E.J.

AlexanderLyNL commented 6 years ago

This will take substantial research and it's on our long term planning. Making Bayes factors for these settings is easy, but constructing good ones takes a lot more effort.

cgiannoulis commented 6 years ago

I thought you were the best of the best! Nice new features in the new jasp by the way - thank you for your amazing work moving the needle in bayesian methods and accessible software that promote research

AugustOlsson commented 4 years ago

Hi,

Is there any ongoing work with implementing Bayesian MANOVA in Jasp? It would be a great addition!

In the mean time, (and sorry if this is off-topic) is it at all resonable to calculate multiple ANOVAs on each level of the dependent variable as a kind of bad "pseudo"-Manova?

EJWagenmakers commented 9 months ago

@tomtomme it does not do much good to assign issues to me, as I lack the skill and the time to implement them. But I guess I can re-assign them. This one is pretty tricky though, as it awaits more stats development -- it is not a matter of implementing an existing R package.

EJWagenmakers commented 9 months ago

I am co-assigning this to Don, not because he needs to do it in the near future, but so the issue remains on our radar (which it will, because we ar offering the classical MANOVA, and we want to achieve a complete Bayesian echo)

tomtomme commented 9 months ago

@EJWagenmakers I know. I assign only those issues to you, where I think your input is needed, since @AugustOlsson requested an update on the situation (and he is very active here). And I myself did not feel competent to give an update on the research-front of BMANOVA or to decide whom to assign this to. So thx for clarifying that this is still research area and the re-assignment, since this was exactly the goal :D

cgiannoulis commented 9 months ago

Thank you so very much!! I can't wait to see what you guys can do!!