Open PetBuj opened 2 years ago
Hi @PetBuj, thanks for the reports.
Hello,
I mean something like this:
Minimum Iteration Section
Iteration No. of Percent of Bar Chart
No. Clusters Variation of Percent
1 2 56.39 |||||||||||||||||
4 3 33.06 ||||||||||
7 4 25.69 ||||||||
(NCSS report)
Where PercentOfVariation means how much (0-100%) the selected clusters (2-k) in k-means are possible reduce variability of the objects (when covering by k-clusters).
Best regards,
P. Bujok
From: Julius Pfadt @.> Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2022 9:23 AM To: jasp-stats/jasp-issues @.> Cc: Petr Bujok @.>; Mention @.> Subject: Re: [jasp-stats/jasp-issues] [Feature Request]: several points to increase user-friendly approach (Issue #1549)
Hi @PetBujhttps://github.com/PetBuj, thanks for the reports.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jasp-stats/jasp-issues/issues/1549#issuecomment-1237757629, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVQORQPQ4K4B4CVOWXH7J23V43WNXANCNFSM5KDL5TEQ. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
what do you think @Kucharssim ?
Dear @PetBuj,
Thanks for the points for improvement, I will break it down in separate points.
As @juliuspf wrote, this is already covered by a different issue: https://github.com/jasp-stats/jasp-issues/issues/1666
I am not sure what you mean, the contingency analysis already allows specifying input data by using existing counts. Could you please clarify what is missing?
I think we could do that, perhaps @fqixiang could have a look...
Further, you wrote:
I mean something like this:
Minimum Iteration Section
Iteration No. of Percent of Bar Chart
No. Clusters Variation of Percent
1 2 56.39 |||||||||||||||||
4 3 33.06 ||||||||||
7 4 25.69 ||||||||
(NCSS report)
Where PercentOfVariation means how much (0-100%) the selected clusters (2-k) in k-means are possible reduce variability of the objects (when covering by k-clusters).
That seems to me that you meant to write this response to this issue instead https://github.com/jasp-stats/jasp-issues/issues/1407, is that correct? Thanks!
Dear Simon,
Best regards,
P. Bujok
From: Simon Kucharsky @.> Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2022 3:20 PM To: jasp-stats/jasp-issues @.> Cc: Petr Bujok @.>; Mention @.> Subject: Re: [jasp-stats/jasp-issues] [Feature Request]: several points to increase user-friendly approach (Issue #1549)
Dear @PetBujhttps://github.com/PetBuj,
Thanks for the points for improvement, I will break it down in separate points.
As @juliuspfhttps://github.com/juliuspf wrote, this is already covered by a different issue: #1666https://github.com/jasp-stats/jasp-issues/issues/1666
I am not sure what you mean, the contingency analysis already allows specifying input data by using existing counts. Could you please clarify what is missing?
I think we could do that, perhaps @fqixianghttps://github.com/fqixiang could have a look...
Further, you wrote:
I mean something like this:
Minimum Iteration Section
Iteration No. of Percent of Bar Chart
No. Clusters Variation of Percent
1 2 56.39 |||||||||||||||||
4 3 33.06 ||||||||||
7 4 25.69 ||||||||
(NCSS report)
Where PercentOfVariation means how much (0-100%) the selected clusters (2-k) in k-means are possible reduce variability of the objects (when covering by k-clusters).
That seems to me that you meant to write this response to this issue instead #1407https://github.com/jasp-stats/jasp-issues/issues/1407, is that correct? Thanks!
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jasp-stats/jasp-issues/issues/1549#issuecomment-1238141709, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVQORQM7TQO2KA7TITXSDWLV45AG5ANCNFSM5KDL5TEQ. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Hi @Kucharssim & @juliuspfadt For a grounding in nonlinear regression see:
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-0-387-09616-2
and a great implementation:
Florent Baty, Christian Ritz, Sandrine Charles, Martin Brutsche, Jean-Pierre Flandrois, Marie-Laure Delignette-Muller (2015). “A Toolbox for Nonlinear Regression in R: The Package nlstools.” Journal of Statistical Software, 66(5), 1–21. doi:10.18637/jss.v066.i05.
Which builds on the nls function in the stats package
I was just coming to suggest this, but someone beat me to it!
missing part from this issue is adding more casewise diagnostics for linear regression
@TarandeepKang Can you have a look at point 3 from my comment above? Is that implementation of non-linear regression sufficient? Or do we need nls from stats package?
So I would suggest that in the meantime we should find some way (maybe the help file) in the regression module of saying that polynomial regression is possible with flexplot. I had no idea! In the longer term, would be great to have maximum flexibility from nls, there will obviously be much work and I think there are greater priorities. Don't you agree?
Agreed. Added the documentation-hint to the list: https://github.com/jasp-stats/jasp-issues/issues/2529
remaining parts from this issue:
adding more casewise diagnostics for linear regression
In the longer term, adding more flexible non-linear regression via
Yes, I agree.
Petr B
From: TarandeepKang @.> Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2024 6:52 PM To: jasp-stats/jasp-issues @.> Cc: Bujok Petr @.>; Mention @.> Subject: Re: [jasp-stats/jasp-issues] [Feature Request]: jackknife and leverage in linear regression + non-linear regression (Issue #1549)
So I would suggest that in the meantime we should find some way (maybe the help file) in the regression module of saying that polynomial regression is possible with flexplot. I had no idea! In the longer term, would be great to have maximum flexibility from nls, there will obviously be much work and I think there are greater priorities. Don't you agree?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jasp-stats/jasp-issues/issues/1549#issuecomment-1962436697, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVQORQJ5BRX5QKE7HWJSQALYVISETAVCNFSM5KDL5TE2U5DIOJSWCZC7NNSXTN2JONZXKZKDN5WW2ZLOOQ5TCOJWGI2DGNRWHE3Q. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.**@.>>
Description
I supposed to add several features to existing JASP-methods to make it more useful.
Purpose
The purpose is to incerase usability of JASP.
Use-case
No response
Is your feature request related to a problem?
no
Describe the solution you would like
Describe alternatives that you have considered
I believe, all these features/methods are available in R packages and therefore, the process is highly possible.
Additional context
Thank authors of JASP to work on this very practical free package!