Clarify wording in explanation on Benford's Law (Audit/JfA module)

[JoKeyser]

• JASP version: 13.1
• Analysis: Audit -> Benford's Law
• Bug description: Sorry if this is a bit nitpicky. During translation work, I stumbled across the explanatory text in Benford's Law (in stable, see e.g. here), emphasis mine:

  Benford's law states that in many naturally occurring collections of numbers, the leading significant number is likely to be small. The goal of this procedure is to determine to which extent the first leading numbers in the population follow Benford's law, and to test this relation with %1$s confidence.

At first reading, I got confused which use of "number" refers to the digit, or observations in the data/population.

• Expected behaviour: Clearer formulation, here my suggestion:

"Benford's law states that in many naturally occurring collections of numerical observations, the leading significant digit is likely to be small. The goal of this procedure is to determine to which extent the first leading digits in the data set follow Benford's law, and to test this relation with %1$s confidence."

If others agree, I'm happy to send a pull request, if you point me to the correct file where to change this - I would assume https://github.com/jasp-stats/jasp-desktop/blob/stable/JASP-Engine/JASP/po/R-JASP.pot?

[AlexanderLyNL]

Hi Johannes,

Thanks for pointing this out. This is very useful. @koenderks could you look into this?

Cheers, Alexander

[koenderks]

Thanks for the suggestion, I agree that this is more clearly formulated. I will make these adjustments on the R side. @FransMeerhoff can you give a little suggestion on the best course of action from there? I believe these changes will then automatically show up in the next versions of the .po files, correct?

[FransMeerhoff]

@koenderks If you take care of the R-side, I'll make a PR with Dutch translation to check. OK for time being?

[AlexanderLyNL]

Fixed