Closed fbemm closed 5 years ago
Hi Felix,
Im not completely sure if I understand your question, but in theory, if you
use 'reveal variants' you should with the -r parameter be able to project
variants onto any of the paths that are encoded in the graph. If the
reference that you use for transform is not in there you should able to add
it using 'reveal rem
However, as decomposing the graph into bubbles depends on having a directed acyclic graph I currently first remove the 'untransformed' paths through the graph (the ones with a *-prefix). This is a bit 'harsh' and I agree it's not ideal, but it mostly fits my needs as I almost always interpret my variants with respect to a single reference.
Is this your problem? Jasper
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 4:27 PM Felix Bemm notifications@github.com wrote:
Hey Jasper,
is there a straight forward way to add the chosen reference (as path) to the GFA generated by reveal rem (as part of reveal align)? Sort a to be able to project variants back to original reference path in the end.
Cheers, Felix
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/jasperlinthorst/reveal/issues/28, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAH85nLtslz5V6xRgDpPQHccxKSkSfcPks5uzVn6gaJpZM4Y1u1k .
Hey Jasper,
I think you got me right. I want to do the same thing. And I was sort a stupid when looking at the file. Everything is there! Would it be possible to restrict the output of reveal variants to multiple references?
Thanks a lot! Felix
Mh, but that can also be done using a simple grep ;)
Hey Jasper,
is there a straight forward way to add the chosen reference (as path) to the GFA generated by reveal rem (as part of reveal align)? Sort a to be able to project variants back to original reference path in the end.
Cheers, Felix