Closed StoneCypher closed 10 months ago
@StoneCypher Looking through all of your comments now. With regards to this one, the only thing that prompted me to make this at all was just to challenge myself with a more complex project than I'd attempted in the past. I had a brief, fleeting thought about making it actually playable but it quickly dissipated when I realized I had absolutely no idea how to do that and I just wanted to see if I could correctly create the game with rules. So, to answer your questions, yes, no, no, no.
Side note - I tried to search for you on Discord and couldn't find anything.
You're actually fairly close to a playable game
If you can display the game, and if you can interpret the rules, then:
Side note - I tried to search for you on Discord and couldn't find anything.
Try here
One thing that isn't addressed here so far is the concept of player locality
This line of questions reflects something called second system syndrome, wherein as something nears completion or reaches first version completion, the "next" version is weighed down with every single thing under the sun.
I ask these questions not because I want you to add these things, but rather, because I think it would be useful to intentionally decline them at this time, with the prudence of "for later" or "for never." Indeed, I very strongly urge the current-time answers "yes, no, no, no."
Computer opponents are fun to write, but also difficult the first time around. (Be happy to show you how, but, again, very strongly recommend that as a version 2+ feature. Smart programmers cut the current version early; learn the phrases YAGNI and MVP.)
Anonymous player matching implies a server, and dealing with abusive players. I'd honestly just completely pass on it.
Intentional matching, again, difficult the first time around; probably a version 2+ feature, but potentially worth your time.
Please concretely answer all four of those questions before closing this ticket. This is a thinking ticket; close it at your leisure.