Add a little more detail to "components"

[matozoid]

It would be good to mention the following "components" or "features" with a one or two line description:

• pretty printing
• meta model
• CST
• lexical preservation
• mutable AST
• visitors
• tokens attached to nodes
• comment assignment algorithm
• Javadoc parser/printer
• Source root

[ftomassetti]

True. Some of them are user facing features, while others (CST, meta model) are more implementation information relevant to contributors or very advanced users

[matozoid]

The CST certainly pretty prints well, though.

[ftomassetti]

Should we have a specific page named components? Should we list those in the homepage?

[matozoid]

I've used "features" instead of "components" in our secret document now, that seems to cover the topic better. I propose something like "Symbol Solver - (description of what it does) - (description of what to expect when using it)"

[matozoid]

Oh, yeah, we can make a separate page or not. You're in charge of the site :-)