Open zonca opened 1 month ago
I'm trying to follow the same style as the original repo from Intel-habana. And that's what they use. However, I think you are right and keeping a main
branch (with tags) makes more sense on Voyager because there is only one version.
They actually also have a master branch
But they definitely use the branches in in unconventional way.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2024, 12:56 javierhndev @.***> wrote:
I'm trying to follow the same style as the original repo from Intel-habana https://github.com/HabanaAI/Model-References/tree/1.15.1. And that's what they use. However, I think you are right and keeping a main branch (with tags) makes more sense on Voyager because there is only one version.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/javierhndev/Voyager-Reference-Models/issues/1#issuecomment-2392218379, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAC5Q4SEA4IQETEC65ZZ34TZZWOPNAVCNFSM6AAAAABPKOZQ7WVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGOJSGIYTQMZXHE . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
I see that in the repo you use version tags like
v1.15.1
to reference branches.The usual way instead is to have 1 single branch which is
main
, then you create thev1.15.1
tag
which references a specific version of themain
branch.Is there a specific reason why you do not have a
main
branch but only "version-tagged" branches?